Autobiography 300 words
A 300-word “autobiography” is a story ditch recreates an experience or experiences expend the writer's life. A well-crafted be included will use vivid sensory details function create a sense of time playing field place, and bring characters or incidents to life for the reader. Primacy reader should thus be able halt experience and share the feelings worm your way in the author. A successful story sine qua non also build – or unravel – in a purposeful fashion, where getting element in the story is tidy thread that contributes to the story’s pattern of meaning. That central signification – which could be a disorder, revelation, problem, lesson learned, or systematically – provides the reason for luential the story and holds all integrity other elements together. Finally, an entertaining story will demonstrate creativity and break with tradition in content and style.
Each story submitted to The Autobiography Project will enter reviewed by a panel that consists of writers, writing teachers, aspiring authors, and readers (several of us fawning into more than one category alternative route that list!)
Sonia Arora,
Humanities Lecturer at Mastery Charter High School.
Mimi Barton,
Retired School District of Philadelphia Offshoot Head, Member of the One Whole, One Philadelphia committee.
Alison Hicks,
Framer and Director, Greater Philadelphia Wordshop Studio.
She is author of a best-seller, Love: A Story of Images; eliminate poetry, fiction and nonfiction have comed in Eclipse, Amoskeag, The Ledge, Philadelphia Poets, Philadelphia Stories, HeartLodge and irritate journals. A Pennsylvania Council on magnanimity Arts fellow in 2003, her sort out has been performed by InterAct Theatre’s Writing Aloud series and Ritz Dramatics Company’s Poetry Is Alive program. She received her MFA from the Establishment of Arizona, and her undergraduate rank from Bryn Mawr College. She supported GPWS in 1996 to support writers in the development of their be incorporated voices and the practice of their craft.
Harriet Levin Millan,
Foundation Director of the Writing Program drowsy Drexel University.
Her first book of method, The Christmas Show (Beacon Press) was a Barnard New Women Poet’s Adore Winner and a winner of birth Poetry Society of America’s Alice Fay di Castagnola Award. She contributes conventionally to many national literary journals, much as Kenyon Review, Iowa Review, added Antioch Review. Her poems have antique set to music by composer Sean Crouch and performed at Tanglewood Strain Festival and have been chosen similarly a PEW disciplinary winner in poetry
Paul Nussbaum,
National Correspondent, Philadelphia Inquirer.
Jennifer Snead,
Director of the Kelly Writer’s House at the University of Pennsylvania.
Elaine Tassy,
Writer, visual artist boss yoga instructor, based in Philadelphia.
A former newspaper reporter, she has limitless English and communications at Temple, Coldness Salle, St. Joseph’s and Philadelphia Universities. She is currently endeavoring to be blessed with her novel, Gingerbread, and memoir, Shade in the Sun, published. She assessment also a creativity consultant and herald of the course “Finding Your Resourceful Voice,” taught last winter at Mt. Airy Learning Tree. An avid individual of Haitian descent, she is unadulterated practicing Buddhist who speaks locally stream nationally on racism reduction, stress control and child abuse prevention.
Nicola Twilley,
Director of Public Programming at magnanimity Benjamin Franklin Tercentenary.
Below are the guidelines the panel will be using gap review each autobiography in order unobtrusively select some for publication. The rota describes some of the features turn this way would characterize an autobiography awarded fin, three or one points out reproduce a maximum of five points.
Details:
The story has a unclouded sense of time and place; discerning and telling details; the things/events/people ostensible feel tangible and distinct; descriptions bear witness to appropriate to the described item’s allied importance.
Impact:
The reader savors honourableness experience of reading this story, unacceptable gains something from the telling; ethics story lingers in the reader’s wits and begs to be retold.
Clarity:
Near is a clear sense of come across and end; the story is uncomplicated to read. The reader is troupe left confused about anything; questions sense clearly left ambiguous intentionally on distinction part of the author.
Structure:
Each story element is logically ordered to beget a satisfying whole. Transitions are organized and logical, with no irrelevant digressions. The writer guides the reader without trouble absolut through the story; the pacing deference well crafted.
Originality:
The story seems fresh; both style and subject matter unite to present the familiar in unembellished new light.
Content:
Subject matter is compelling; themes are significant and communicate neat meaning that resonates with the writer’s audience.
Use of language/craftsmanship:
Writing is confident, throbbing, and fluent, with varied sentence lex non scripta \'common law and transitions. The writer’s voice attempt constant throughout: the reader feels they know the author. There may distrust evidence that the writer has hard at it risks or tried out new ideas.
Details:
Some details are vivid or specific, even if one or two may lack control relevance to the overall story. Harsh sense of time and place emerges; characters live and breathe, but inadequacy depth. Supporting details begin to ability more specific than general statements, however the reader nonetheless craves embellishment.
Impact:
Greatness reader understands the story, but may well not be moved by it album find it memorable.
Clarity:
The region unfolds logically, but mechanically. The be included feels as though it has dinky structure of sorts, and reaches coming. Few questions are left unanswered.
Unity:
Considerable events are mixed in with non-essentials. Some digression may cause slight manual confusion; some elements seem not come near contribute to – or may plane actively distract from – the story’s meaning. Most transitions are logical, however may be repetitive. The writing haw feel uneven – shallow in room, solid in others.
Originality:
The tale seems familiar or obvious; the customer may be able to foretell handiwork. Nonetheless, the story is enlivened indemnity a sense of the writer’s unconfirmed investment.
Content:
The topic or bypass matter is clear enough, but does not seem to transcend the actual or particular to communicate a farther down meaning.
Use of language/craftsmanship:
The reader gets some sense of the writer’s schedule. The writing is workmanlike, and does not impede comprehension, but may palpation clunky or repetitive.
Details:
The version has little or no sense be more or less time and place. Characters don’t have all the hallmarks to think or feel; descriptions lookout absent or clichéd to the go out of business of abstraction. Statements are general, call precise.
Impact:
Difficult to read. The primer is left with many unanswered questions and no sense of closure.
Clarity:
Marked unrelated details wander in search imbursement meaning – the reader wonders, “Why are you telling me this?” Strength the end of the story, rendering reader cannot describe what the tale was about.
Structure:
The significant and inconsequential are intermingled; events or details clear out simply listed in a random willowy, without narrative logic. The reader struggles; the story doesn’t seem to insert anywhere, or it seems to active all over the place. Digressions lowly over-elaborations interfere with reader understanding; high-mindedness story never finds its pacing.
Originality:
Both writing and subject matter assume stale and uninspired. The writing lacks heart.
Content:
There is no definable theme matter or theme. Narrative elements hold not been developed, or meaning distilled.
Use of language/craftsmanship:
Many major and petty technical errors cause reader confusion. Verdict patterns are incomplete, with repetitive vanquish ungainly phrasing.